FDD-Backed Comparisons

Compare Franchise Brands

Side-by-side comparisons of investment costs, revenue potential, and unit growth — all sourced from actual Franchise Disclosure Documents.

Back to Compare
vs
M
McDonald's

Food & Beverage

62
vs
61
McDonald's edges ahead overall
Jersey Mike's

Food & Beverage

J
MetricMcDonald'sJersey Mike's
Overall Score
Weighted composite score
62 / 1061 / 10
Total Investment
Lower midpoint is better
$1,471,000 – $2,728,000$185,903 – $1,417,592
Royalty Rate
Lower is better
4% or 5%6.5
Marketing Fund
Lower is better
4%1.0
Item 19 Avg Revenue
Higher is better — from government-filed FDD
$4,002,000$1,338,874
Units in Item 19 Sample
Higher % = more representative sample
12,572 (93% of system)2,255 (75% of system)
Item 19 Median Revenue
Median is more reliable than avg when skewed by top performers
$3,838,000$1,285,259
Total Units
Larger network = stronger brand
13,5592,989
Net Unit Growth
Net new units in period
+102+0
Red Flags
Fewer is better
6 flags0 flags
Confidence Score
Data completeness and extraction quality
92 / 10074 / 100
Unit Turnover Rate
Closed + transferred ÷ total — lower is healthier
3.4%0%
Bankruptcy History
Item 4 — franchisor or affiliate bankruptcies
None disclosedNone disclosed
Training Hours
Item 11 — initial training hours (more = better support)
600h
Exclusive Territory
Item 12 — protected territory granted
NoNo
Initial Term
Item 17 — initial franchise agreement length
20 yrs10 yrs
Mandatory Arbitration
Item 17 — disputes must go to arbitration (limits your legal options)
NoRequired
Post-term Non-compete
Item 17 — restrictions after you exit the franchise
1.5yr / 10mi2yr / 10mi

Choose McDonald's if…

  • Disclosed revenue is a deciding factor for you
  • You want to keep all legal options open
  • You value intensive initial training
  • You want a brand that is actively growing

Choose Jersey Mike's if…

  • You want a lower initial investment
  • Franchisee retention and stability matter to you
FeatureMcDonald'sJersey Mike's
Item 19 Revenue Disclosed
Exclusive Territory
No Mandatory Arbitration
Audited Financials (Item 21)
No Going Concern Warning
Franchisor Clean Auditor Opinion
No Mandatory Supplier Lock-in
Direct Sales (No FSO Brokers)
National Distribution (25+ States)
No Geographic Concentration Risk
Exclusive Territory (Item 12)
Franchisor Cannot Compete in Territory
Online Sales Not Reserved by Franchisor
Experienced Management (Item 2)
Franchise-Experienced Leadership
Low Supplier Lock-In (Item 8)
No Franchisor Supplier Revenue (Item 8)
No Bankruptcy History (Item 4)
Annual Conference
Field Support
Technology System
Renewal Option

Diligence Score Breakdown (0–100)

McDonald's: 70System HealthJersey Mike's: 75
McDonald's: 78Franchisor StrengthJersey Mike's: 65
McDonald's: 38Contract BurdenJersey Mike's: 43
McDonald's: 77EconomicsJersey Mike's: 65
McDonald's: 92ConfidenceJersey Mike's: 74

Want a Custom Comparison?

Need a detailed side-by-side analysis of two specific franchise brands not shown here? Our research team can prepare a custom comparison report based on the latest FDD filings.

Important Notice:Franchisel provides franchise research and analysis for informational purposes only. This is not financial, legal, or investment advice. All financial data labeled “Estimated” is approximate and has not been verified against actual FDD filings. Data labeled “FDD Verified” or “State Filing” has been extracted directly from government-filed Franchise Disclosure Documents (MN CARDS, WI DFI, CA DFPI) but may not reflect the most recent filing. Unit counts, revenue figures, and other metrics change frequently. Always request and independently verify the current FDD from the franchisor before making any investment decision. Consult a qualified franchise attorney and accountant before investing. Franchisel is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any franchise system listed on this platform. Scores reflect our editorial analysis methodology and are not endorsed by any franchisor.